RP duo speaks out against Agenda 21
Bookmark and Share
By Jud Snyder  December 7, 2012 12:00 am

These are perilous times for our country here in the 21st century. What with the Israeli-Palestine conflict, Iran tinkering to build a nuclear reactor, attempts to rebuild war-ravaged Iraq, Pakistan and Afghanistan and China’s economic growth as it struggles to combine communism and capitalism, we have a plentiful supply of planet-wide problems to brood about.
Now we have Agenda 21.

It’s a plan to preserve diminishing natural resources by “re-arranging” population growth to place less reliance on the use of fossil fuels and forests to create a more sustainable planet. It’s a United Nations document drafted at the UN’s Earth Summit held in Rio de Janeiro 20 years ago and approved by many nations.

Agenda 21 lays out a collection of voluntary suggestions for countries to “grow smartly,” to help curb pollution, overpopulation, poverty and slow down the use of fossil fuels. Environmentalists everywhere thought it was a sensible step. President George H.W. Bush signed it and his successor, Bill Clinton, accepted it. Since then, Agenda 21’s been lying dormant in Washington.
It’s been categorized as a “soft law,” meaning it exists but no one in Congress wants to touch it at this time. It was rarely mentioned during the election campaign.

But in the last few years, protests against its existence have been building nationwide, almost all of it from right wing and conservative political factions. They say it’s an insidious plan for a New World Order. It hasn’t cohered into a formal movement, only people who share a belief that Agenda 21 is a surreptitious attempt to form a world government under the guise of  “global stability.”

Or as right wing spokesman Glenn Beck said on Fox News, “By agreeing to follow Agenda 21, the U.S. government has colluded with internationalists to undermine its own sovereignty and turn the nation into an environmental refuge where nature would take precedence over people … once (they) put their fangs into our communities and suck all the blood out of it, we will not be able to survive.”

Opponents have many vocal points
Since I’m a reporter looking for a local angle, I got together with Bill Anderson and Jim Bennett, two voluble spokesmen against Agenda 21. Anderson, 61, is a realtor with Home Sellers Realty and has offices in RP’s Commerce Plaza; Bennett, 51, is a writer and frequent contributor to George Barich’s monthly newspaper, the Cotati Independent.

They had a veritable blizzard of data showing the  evil intrusion of Agenda 21 into national and local governments. But almost all of it was verbal. No press releases, no brochures, no flyers to tack on telephone poles, no public notices of meetings in mail boxes.

Bennett, a highly articulate spokesman, dominated the exchanges and Anderson often had to interrupt to make his points.
“They’re subverting the founding principles of our country,” said Bennett. “We’re going from capitalism to communism.”

“Take away our property rights”

“You can favor environmentalism, but the idea of man causing global warming is inaccurate. It’s a lie,” said Anderson. He reminded me: “The Republicans passed a resolution against Agenda 21 at their convention.”

Bennett noted the U.S. Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management “have both been hijacked by Agenda 21. They take away our property rights by using eminent domain laws.”

Attempts to get a handle on the local campaign were difficult. “There a lot of overlapping local patriotic groups supporting us,” said Bennett. He didn’t name any except Democrats Against Agenda 21.

Opponents of the UN pact have apparently not organized into a national group. Here in the North Bay, they have no president, secretary, or any other appointed officers. Neither mentioned the existence of by-laws or meeting schedules. It’s just this amorphous nationwide network working to eliminate Agenda 21 or at least sweep away its “soft law” status in Washington and make sure it never gets on any Congressional agenda.

“Behind the Green Mask”
Anderson gave me a soft cover, 168-page book called “Behind the Green Mask – UN Agenda 21,” which told the complete story. It was written by Santa Rosa author Rosa Koire. Anderson had underlined many passages inside along with red stars for added emphasis. It was about the closest I could get to a local angle.

Their campaign is similar to environmentalist and activist Peter Calthorpe’s drive 20 years ago to get people out of their automobiles and build communities near railroad stations with “mixed use” buildings and jobs clustered close to train depots. But his point was to preserve open space. The anti-Agenda 21 stance contends government open space lands take away people’s private land use rights.

Anderson also rejected the mixed use concept. “They just want to stack people up in small apartments.” He’s also against SMART trains. “They’re not for   transportation but for globalization of sustainable development on a local level.”
Added Bennett, “Individual living styles and property rights” can be destroyed if Agenda 21 is passed.”

The John Birch Society has consistently attacked it with the same fervor it did to communism in the 1950s.

Defending Agenda 21, Michael Barkun, a professor of political science at Syracuse University said, “Any time you get some sort of UN program that says any kind of change in the way people live, even if it seems outwardly benign and even voluntary, it’s going to be taken up by people of a conspiracist bent.”

Post Your Comments:
December 12, 2012
Jud Snyder. What a slanted one sided bit of "journalism." Some of us from the left ,and I'm probably farther left than you, are genuinely concerned about global usurpation of many things on many levels by elite cartels, old money wealth and influence, various groups which in many guises obtain and control resources, sway policies to benefit themselves and to grow its power for its own sake. To pass off opposition to Agenda 21 off as just right wing idiocy throws the baby out with the bath water. Yes Glen Beck is a joke. There are wacko characters in any movement opposing anything. Just like the anarchists in the Occupy effort. To students like myself of alternative history, I have realized there are elite groups with overlapping memberships in this world. As a lifelong Democrat I am against Agenda 21 in principle. Cotati for instance is a member of ICLEI which reflects Agenda 21's precepts. The Cotati government pays dues for membership in this group and did so surreptitiously without any notice or any public hearing. Indeed I was the first one a few years ago who broached the subject at a Cotati City Council meeting when someone had pointe out to me that Cotati pays several hundred bucks to belong to ICLEI.My main objection is that I wish Cotati as small as it is to be independent of any world agenda's plans no matter how environmentally desirable thay are. This isn't like a city subscribing to some magazine or some intercity organization or membership. The whole roundabout controversy, it can be argued is based on Agenda 21 planning and "sustainability" imperatives. Also to deflect opposition to Agenda 21 as just another nutty conspiracy theory (uesed a lot in a pejorative sense) is disingenuos and seeks to deny there are conspiratorial and have been conspiritorial events and groups throughout history. Conspiracies have, do and will exist. A definition of conspiracy theory as it is mostly refered to follows for reference. Some of believe there is and has been covert actions by two or more individuals.

A conspiracy theory is a theory that defies common historical or current understanding of events, under the claim that those events are the result of manipulations by two or more individuals or various secretive powers or conspiracies.
Colloquially, a conspiracy theory is any unconventional theory about current or historical events, with the connotation that that theory is unfounded, outlandish, or irrational or in some way unworthy of serious consideration. In this sense, the term is sometimes used to refer to events with which no association to an actual "conspiracy" in the legal sense (two or more persons plotting and one overt act related to the plot) is claimed. In this sense "conspiracy theory" is often simply an allegation of clandestine action, based on little or no solid evidence. Thus the expression "conspiracy theory" in common speech is often used as a term of derision for an allegation that the speaker considers unproven, unlikely, or false. Conspiracy theories in general allege that some particular event ? such as an assassination, a revolution, or even the failure of a product ? resulted not solely from the visible action of overt political or market forces, but rather from intentional covert action.

December 8, 2012
This is a poor excuse for journalism, I hardly know where to start. Since the agreement was signed onto by the United States in 1992 Agenda 21 has advanced steadily for 20 years. The President's Council on Sustainable Development was formed in 1993 by President Clinton. If you read Rosa Koire's book, Behind the Green Mask: UN Agenda 21 or read the information on her website you would have had some real facts instead of the BS in your article. Just because the perpetrators of A21 have kept knowledge about their programs away from the American public doesn't mean they are not doing it. It has been renamed Sustainable Development to hide the fact that it's an international plan put together by many who are opposed to the United States sovereignty and Constitutional protections. In fact, the very secretive nature of Agenda 21's implementation is more than suspect. Why do they go to such great lengths to mischaracterize the plan and marginalize those who speak out against it? The reason of course is that the plan is very harmful to American citizens.

How is it harmful you say? Let's start with Social Equity. UN Agenda 21 promotes the three E's. Environment, Economy and Equity. The US Constitution doesn't have social equity in it anywhere. Social equity is a concept used by socialists and communists, not in this country. It flies in the face of individual rights. UN Agenda 21 contains a different philosophy from ours and it's called communitarianism, which is the balancing of individual rights with those of the community. That's a threat to Americans and we're seeing this carried out in terms of land use in every place in America right now. If you look at practically any city or county General plan you will find policies that resemble or are exactly the same as those in the UN Agenda 21's 300 page book that was published at the time of the agreement by 179 nations. Have you read this? Obviously not.

Rosa Koire is not a Realtor by the way. She was a land valuation specialist and expert witness for 30 years with CalTrans. She and her group sued the City of Santa Rosa in 2006 to stop their massive redevelopment project. It was through that fight that she learned of the insidious nature of UN Agenda 21. She's a liberal Democrat.

UN Agenda 21 has advanced so far already and has so many operatives that it will be very hard to stop. Here's a list of perpetrators (traitors): Huge multi-national corporations, the World Bank, the EPA and all other Departments of the Federal Government, thousands of UN recognized NGOs (non-governmental organizations, other environmental and social justice non-profits, the progressive wing of the Democratic Party (Socialist Party of America), the Communist Party, Occupy Wallstreet, most Universities, the scghool system, hey what did I leave out? The American people who are now just waking up to this horrendous coup d'etat. We will not stand for it. Do your homework, moron, before you disgrace your profession any further.

December 7, 2012
I am appalled at the one sided slant in this article. you obviously did not do your due dilligence (homework) on this subject. There is loads of data and local involvement AGAINST Agenda 21 and how Cotati is the front runner of Sonoma County in implementing Agend 21. Jud, had you taken an ounceof credibility and applied it to what these two gentlemen were saying and also to the book they handed you, you might have gotten this story correct and given a correctly unbiased story. Did you even do any research into the book "Behind the Green Mask" and it's author? Had you done so, and it should have been pretty easy, you might have figured out that the author, Rosa Koire, is a liberal from the far left. As a Realtor in Sonoma County & Santa Rosa, she saw what Agenda 21 was doing to her industry and started an indepth look into why and found Agenda 21 behind it all. Also, had you contacted The North Bay Patriots, you might have gotten a handful of names that have spoke at their meetings in Cotati on Agenda 21 and how it affects Sonoma County Residents and Cotati Particularly. Please do you homework and give your subjects a little bit more credibility and step away from the Cotati City Council's side.
 *name appears on your post